The Rajasthan High Court has raised serious concerns over the allotment of liquor shops in densely populated markets, saying such decisions “prima facie” (at first glance) violate Articles 21 and 47 of the Constitution.
The court was hearing a petition filed by a shop owner in Jaipur’s Kishanpole Bazar. She had been allotted the liquor shop under the state’s Excise Policy for 2021–22. Recently, on August 13, 2025, the Excise Department issued her a notice asking her to shift the shop to a different location, citing “public resentment.” Challenging this order, she approached the High Court.
Justice Sameer Jain, while issuing notice on the petition, directed the Excise Commissioner and the Principal Secretary to appear via video conference on the next hearing date. The court asked them to:
-
Submit the Temperance Policy of the state in light of Articles 21 and 47.
-
Justify why liquor shops are being allotted in crowded public markets, especially near temples, schools, and other sensitive places.
The court reminded the State that Article 47 of the Constitution requires the government to work towards reducing consumption of intoxicating drinks and drugs, except for medicinal purposes. It also noted that a liquor license does not give the holder a vested right to sell liquor anywhere.
The bench pointed out that despite having a Temperance Policy, the State had still approved liquor shops in highly crowded public areas, which appears contradictory.
The matter will now be heard on September 9, 2025, when the officials are expected to present their explanation.
